THE PRACTICALLITY OF RIGID BODY DYNAMICS CONSTRUCTIVIST MODULE AS PHYISC LEARNING RESOURCE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Nurdawia Nurdawia, Zulirfan Zulirfan, Fakhruddin Z

Abstract


This study aims to measure the practicality of physics constructivist modules in the dynamics of rotation and rigid body balance using ADDIE’s model. The module practicality stages are: preparation, research introduction, practicality testing, filling out questionnaires, analyzing and conclusions, revising, and practical. There are 25 students and one physics teacher who asked using a questionnaire with 5 practical indicators, namely: efficiency, presentation of module material, ease of use, conformity with science, and implementation of constructive elements. The results of module practicality testing data analysis showed that the module efficiency level was 65.83 with the practical category, the module presentation rate was 90.16 with a very practical category, the module's ease of use was 86.08 with a very practical category, the degree of conformity with the science was 95,0 with a very practical category, and the level of implementation of constructive elements is 88.8 with a very practical category. Overall, the practicality of constructivist physics learning modules is 85.17 with a very practical category. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the constructivist physics learning module of rotational dynamics and rigid body balance is declared practical to be used as a source of learning for high school physics students.


Keywords


constructivistic module, rigid body dynamics, physics learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achmad, Munib, 2012. Pengantar Ilmu Pendidikan. UPT Unnes Press, Semarang.

BSNP, 2006. Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. BSNP, Jakarta.

Close, H. G. & Heron, R. L., 2011. Student Understanding of Angular Momentum of Classical Particles. Physic Education Research Section, 79 (10), 1068-1078.

Fitri Dwi Hartati, 2018. Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Fisika Konstruktivistik pada Materi Dinamika dan Keseimbangan Benda Tegar. Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Universitas Riau.

Hafiz Suhendra, 2017. Uji Praktikalitas Alat Peraga Magnet Sebagai Media Pembelajaran IPA Fisika SMP. Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Universitas Riau.

Izaak H. Weno, 2010. Media Belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawala Pendidikan. FKIP Pattimura, Ambon.

Maharta, 2009. Analisis Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA di Bandar Lampung. Science Education Journal, 1 (1), 36-51.

Mulyasa, 2014. Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Muhammad Havid. 2016. Desain Didaktis Pembelajaran Konsep Torsi dan Momen Inersia Berdasarkan Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMA. Repository UPI Education, 134 (7), 459489.

Permendikbud. 2013. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Reny Viajayani, Yohanes Radiyono, & Dwi Teguh Rahardjo, 2013. Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Macromedia Flash Pro 8 pada pokok bahasan Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika UNS, 1 (1), 150-165.

Riduwan, 2005. Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru, Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Rismatul Azizah, Lia Yuliati, & Eny Latifah, 2015. The Physic Problem Solving Difficulties on High School Student. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 5 (2), 44-45.

Rizky, 2014. Kemampuan Multirepresentasi Siswa SMA dalam Menyelesaikan Soalsoal Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 8 (3), 134-145. Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika. Universitas Tanjungpura.

Rizky Nirmala, 2016. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) Disertai Tugas Open Ended untuk Meningkatkan.

Ruseffendi, 2006. Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Sistem Pembelajaran. Nusa Media, Bandung.

Sa’diah, 2012. Remediasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Kelas XII IPA MAN 1 Pontianak pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi Menggunakan Model Learning Cycle 5E. Journal Untan, 2177 (2118), 4589-4598.

Slameto, 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Sugiyono, 2009. Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Alfabeta, Yogyakarta.

Sulistianah, Dewang, 2008. Program bimbingan bagi siswa Underachiever. Skripsi jurusan psikologi pendidikan dan bimbingan. Bandung. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Tidak diterbitkan.

Suharmisi Arikunto, 2012. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Waldrip, B. & Prain, V., 2007. An Exploratory Study of Teachers and Students Use of Multi-modal Representation of Concepts in Primary Science. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (15), 1843-1896.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jgs.6.2.120-126

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Nurdawia Nurdawia, Zulirfan Zulirfan, Fakhruddin Z

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal ini terdaftar dan terindeks pada: