ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS SCIENTIFIC CONSITENCY AND REPRESENTATION CONSISTENCY ON RECTILINEAR MOTION KINEMATICS MATERIAL GRADE X IN SMAN 8 PEKANBARU

Inike Paramita, Yennita Yennita, Fakhruddin Z

Abstract


This study wasaimed to describe the level of student scientific consistency and representation consistency of class X SMA Negeri 8 Pekanbaru on rectilinear motion kinematisc material. The type of research was survey research. The subject of this research were 70 students. The data collection of this research used test, instrument of research used scientific consistency and representation consistency test the form of objektive matter which consist of 21 question wiht seven themes, each theme consist off three question with the same concept but presented in different representatiton. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data which showed the level of scientific consistency and representation consistency. The results showed that thepercentage of student at each scientific consistency level was 14.29% for consistent scientific, 20.00% for moderately consistent scientific and 65.71% for inconsistent scientific, while overall the students were at inconsistent levels for scientific consistency or that can be said they have no consistency scientific. For representation consistency, the percentage of students at each successive level was 17.14% for consistent representation, 28.57% for moderately consistent representation and 54.29% for inconsistent representation, while overall students were at moderately consistent representation level, mean that  studentshave consistency representation.


Keywords


rectilinear motion kinematics, representation consistency, scientific consistency.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman, R., Aprilyawati, & Payudi, 2008. “Limitation Of Representation Mode In Learning Gravitational Concept and Its Influence Toward Student Skill Problem solving”. Proceeding of The 2nd International Seminar on Science education. PHY-31. p.373-377.

Ainsworth, S., 2006. A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 16(3). p.183–198.

Aminudin, D., Sutiadi A., & Samsudin. A., 2013. Profil Konsistensi Representasi dan Konsistensi Ilmiah Siswa SMP pada Konsep Gerak. Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika, Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. 1 (3).

Binar, K., 2015. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Model Inkuiri

Terbimbing untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Multi Representasi Siswa SMA. Pendidikan Sains Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya. 4 (2), 2089-1776.

Dya, Q. A., Sukarmin, & Suparni, 2015. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Modified Free Inquiry Guided Inquiry terhadap Kemampuan Multirepresentasi Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal dan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurnal Inkuiri, 4(1), 2252-7893.

Etkina, E., Rosengrant, D., & Van Heuvelen, A., 2006. Multiple Representations. Physics Education Research, 2, 020103.

Fatmawati, Muslimin, & Kade A., 2015. Identifikasi Tingkat Konsistensi Representasi dan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa pada Format Verbal, Grafik dan Diagram dalam Memecahkan Masalah Hukum III Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako (JPFT), 4(1). p.33-38. 2338-3240.

Fathoroni, 2016. Konsistensi Representasi Besaran Fisis Materi Kinematika. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM., 1. 978-602-9286-21-2.

Goldin, G. A., 2002. Representation in Mathematical Learning and Problem Solving. L.D English (Ed). Handbook of International research in Mathematics Education(IRME). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1.

Kohl, P.B., & Noah D.F., 2008. Pattern of Multiple Representation Use by Expert and Novices During Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 4 (1).

Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Virii, J., 2010. Force Concept Inventory-based Multiple-Choice Test for Investigating Students’ Representational Consistency. Phys. Rev. ST. Phys. Educ. Res. 6 (2). 020109.

Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Virii, J., 2012. Relation between Representational Consistency, Conceptual Understanding of the Force Conc.

Sriyansyah, S. P., 2015. Analisis Konsistensi Representasi dan Konsistensi Ilmiah Mahasiswa pada Konsep Gaya Menggunakan Tes R-FCI. Indonesian Journal of Cience Education, 4 (1). p.75-82.

Sukardi, 2015. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta . Van Heuvelen, A. & Zou, X., 2000. Multiple Representation of Work-Energy Processes. Am. J. Phys., 69(2), P.184194.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jgs.6.1.9-18

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Inike Paramita, Yennita Yennita, Fakhruddin Z

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal ini terdaftar dan terindeks pada: